Can AI be something I genuinely enjoy using and something I still have serious questions about? I am starting to think the contradiction may be part of the point.
AI and creativity
AI can produce explanations instantly, but understanding still takes effort. A reflection on how the ease of AI might quietly change the way we think and learn.
A quiet question I keep returning to while working with AI: when does a tool help us think, and when does it slowly start thinking for us?
Does using AI make us less creative—or does it simply change what creativity looks like? I’ve noticed that when I bring AI into my process, I don’t stop being creative. Instead, my role shifts: from building everything myself to shaping, questioning, and remixing. It feels different, but no less real.
I’m not making money from my blog, and that’s okay. What I’m making instead is space—for curiosity, creative experiments, and projects that don’t need to “succeed” to be meaningful.
I don’t see myself as an expert—and I don’t want to be one. This space isn’t about mastery. It’s about staying curious, asking questions, and protecting the joy of not knowing yet.